Pure evil...with a cape!
 Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:46 pm Post subject: |
 |
Well seeing as how my only duck is "Philosophical"  , I can honestly say I don't have any ruffled feathers.  I still don't see any double standards since I know I report everything that I find, whether I think it's harmless or not. I can easily see how people would feel attacked by the way the OP was stated, I know *I* felt questioned about my intentions on test. I'm sure Lady Z didn't mean to come across that way, but that's how I read it.
I don't think testers are any more defensive than the CCG is when they're questioned for that matter either. I could say how I've had very few positive encounters with the CCG and they will leap to say it couldn't possibly be anyone from the CCG who did it...how is that any different? I know I report bugs and glitches, I know my friends do too and I think we're all trying to clarify WHY we don't report the same bug day after day when we KNOW they know and have chosen (for whatever reason) to not fix them. BTW...if we didn't go off topic, I'd think I was on the wrong board. 
Tristan _________________ ~You know you're getting older when Happy Hour is a nap.~ Open: Mama Mondo 120 (Soundless), Monster Mom 120 Ida Zervbetter 120, Lucinda Streets 114 Sue Cherself 109, Chasen D Mowse 109 Baby 107, Ken U Seeme 107 Test: Upton O Good 107, Hawthorne N Yercyde 107 Meg Yermindup 104, Meg Yermindup 104, Phylis Officle 100, Haile Improbable 60 and many more... |
|
  |
